Sunday, August 28, 2011

Infovest21Special Research Report: The growing importance of branding in hedge fund manager growth

In general, hedge fund managers have not yet made conscious branding decisions. In fact, most firms in the hedge fund space have ignored branding.

When it does occur, branding in the industry is often driven by the personality of the manager. Therefore, the product, i.e. the investment management service, is inextricably tied to that personality by default rather than a conscious strategic effort to create a brand.

But as institutions continue to be the driving force in the hedge fund industry and the main provider of assets, more managers strive to be of “institutional quality.”

Brand is very important in the institutional market place. Most of the institutional money has flowed to the largest hedge fund managers over last two years as they are seen as the managers with the strongest brand.

Institutions view these managers as a safe place to put their money. They are seen as asset managers, not just hedge fund managers.

Many institutional investors are more attracted to a firm’s sustainable infrastructure rather than a high rate of return.

Branding is relevant to any size manager. Smaller managers have a greater need for branding than larger managers. Part of branding will be achieved by educating investors about a strategy or sector. The manager can become a go-to resource for that specific niche.

As hedge fund managers attempt to build their stature as institutional asset managers, they often focus upon their perceived branding in the marketplace and how it enhances their overall acceptance to larger investors. Analyzing their branding forces hedge fund managers to review a wide range of issues: from their company name to their mission statement to their investment objectives to the associations they have built in their service providers.

Marketing and public relations experts say a number of activities should be taken. Branding includes everything from how they answer the phone to marketing materials to the website to corporate personality. Branding is making the name of your company stand for something that is positive in the client’s mind. It includes the name, logo, tagline, website, core message, road show, and what people write about the company. It is not just the products and deliverables.

That message needs to be linear and concise and clearly articulate the differential advantages of the hedge fund across the various factors used to analyze hedge funds.

Some point to the mutual fund industry as a model as it has a longer history. “It used to sell performance. Then in the late 1990s, everyone wanted to know what Peter Lynch of Fidelity thought. Now, they no longer sell individuals and sell performance less. They sell an institutional name. Who knows who manages the individual mutual funds? It is the brand, more than the individual manager. People want the brand of trust.”

Other thoughts on branding

Brand is different than the actual quality. Hopefully, they are the same but there are a lot of good firms that don’t do a good job of articulating what they do and their brand in the market place is below the quality of the fund they offer. Other firms have a very good brand but the underlying product isn’t at the same level as people’s perception of that firm. This may be true for many of the largest managers.

A brand can also be negative. For example, accusations of insider trading or other negative press reduces high quality perception that a firm wants to have.

Some marketers take a contrarian view and say there are no hedge fund brands. They say hedge funds grow because they are institutional and generate superior performance. They argue that a hedge fund can try to brand, but without performance it will eventually lose assets regardless of the customer’s identification with the fund. Rather than branding, they focus on differentiation.

Building a brand is a slow process. A consistent high quality message needs to be heard over time. If the manager delivers what he says, over time, the brand will develop.

In its special report, Infovest21 provides a number of case studies that illustrate how managers, in different circumstances, achieved their specific branding goals. While the report focuses primarily on hedge fund managers, a section is provided on branding as it relates to service providers.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Top Pension Funds By Assets ($B)

  • California Public Employees 214.6
  • Federal Retirement Thrift 210.6
  • California State Teachers 147.2
  • New York State Common 138.4
  • Florida State Board 118.7
  • General Motors 110.3
  • New York City Retirement 107.3
  • Texas Teachers 95.9
  • AT&T 89.6
  • New York State Teachers 88.5
  • IBM 78.9
  • Wisconsin Investment Board 74.5
  • New Jersey 71.8
  • North Carolina 70.5
  • General Electric 70.3
  • Ohio Public Employees 69.6
  • Boeing 68.9
  • Ohio State Teachers 62.9
  • Washington State Board 61.5
  • Michigan Retirement 57.2
  • Oregon Public Employees 55.3
  • Pennsylvania School Employees 54.7
  • Verizon 51.8
  • Virginia Retirement 50.4
  • Ford Motor 48.8
  • University of California 47.1
  • Georgia Teachers 46.6
  • Minnesota State Board 46.5
  • Massachusetts PRIM 45.4
  • Lockheed Martin 43.8
  • Alcatel Lucent 41.3
  • Colorado Employees 36.6
  • United Nations Joint Staff 35.4
  • Los Angeles County Employees 35.2
  • Illinois Teachers 34.1
  • Maryland State Retirement 32.7
  • Northrop Grumman 31.9
  • Pennsylvania Employees 31.1
  • Teamsters, Western 30.3
  • Tennessee Consolidated 30.3
  • Bank of America 28.5
  • Exxon Mobil 28.0
  • Alabama Retirement 27.6
  • United Technologies 27.5
  • Chrysler 26.6
  • National Railroad 25.3
  • Missouri Public Schools 24.6
  • Utah State Retirement 24.5
  • South Carolina Retirement 24.5
  • DuPont 24.4
  • United Parcel Service 23.6
  • Arizona State Retirement 23.6
  • Connecticut Retirement 23.6
  • Raytheon 22.8
  • Texas Employees 21.9
  • Citigroup 21.2
  • Teamsters, Central States 21.2
  • Iowa Public Employees 2.6
  • Nevada Public Employees 20.6
  • Illinois Municipal 20.6
  • Hewlett Packard 20.1
  • JPMorgan Chase 19.9
  • Chevron 19.4
  • Honeywell 18.9
  • Mississippi Employees 18.9
  • Dow Chemical 18.7
  • State Farm 17.5
  • Alaska Retirement 17.4
  • Procter & Gamble 17.1
  • FedEx 16.9
  • Kaiser 16.9
  • Shell Oil 16.8
  • American Airlines 16.7
  • 3M 16.2
  • Wells Fargo 16.2
  • San Francisco City & County 15.9
  • United Methodist Church 14.8
  • Prudential 14.6
  • Texas County & District 14.4
  • Texas Municipal Retirement 14.1
  • BP American 14.1
  • Indiana Public Employees 13.9
  • Georgia Employees 13.9
  • World Bank 13.8
  • Illinois State Universities 13.7
  • Los Angeles Fire & Police 13.2
  • Caterpillar 13.2
  • Wachovia 13.2
  • Kentucky Teachers 13.2
  • Louisiana Teachers 13.1
  • Illinois State Board 12.9
  • Delphia 12.9
  • National Electric 12.6
  • Johnson & Johnson 12.6
  • Eastman Kodak 12.5
  • Pfizer 12.5
  • General Dynamics 12.3
  • PG&E 11.9
  • ConocoPhillips 11.9
  • Kentucky Retirement 11.7
  • Exelon 11.6
  • Kansas Public Employees 11.6
  • Deere 11.6
  • Qwest 11.3
  • New Mexico Public Employees 11.0
  • Kraft Foods 10.9
  • International Paper 10.9
  • Alcoa 10.8
  • Siemens USA 10.7
  • Ohio Police & Fire 10.7
  • MetLife 10.7
  • Southern Co 10.5
  • Chicago Teachers 10.3
  • Federal Reserve Employees 10.1
  • Idaho Public Employees 9.9
  • Hawaii Employees 9.8
  • New York State Deferred Comp 9.8
  • Los Angeles City Employees 9.7
  • Ohio School Employees 9.6
  • Arkansas Teachers 9.6
  • Maine State Retirement 9.6
  • Wal-Mart Stores 9.5
  • Weyerhaeuser 9.5
  • Consolidated Edison 9.5
  • Koch Industries 9.5
  • US Steel 9.4
  • Abbott Laboratories 8.9
  • Episcopal Church 8.9
  • 1199SEIU National 8.9
  • Motorola 8.8
  • Operating Eng. International 8.8
  • Xerox 8.8
  • Altria 8.7
  • PepsiCo 8.4
  • Delta Air Lines 8.4
  • Missouri State Employees 8.3
  • Eli Lilly 8.3
  • Oklahoma Teachers 8.2
  • National Rural Electric 8.1
  • Boilermaker-Blacksmith 8.1
  • Northwest Airlines 8.0
  • Sears Holding 8.0
  • Aetna 7.9
  • New Mexico Educational 7.9
  • New York City Deferred Comp 7.9
  • Electrical Ind, Joint Board 7.9
  • Intel 7.9
  • Nebraska Investment Council 7.8
  • Indiana Teachers 7.8
  • JC Penney 7.8
  • Louisiana State Employees 7.8
  • Merck 7.8
  • IAM National 7.7
  • Tennessee Valley Authority 7.5
  • San Diego County 7.5
  • West Virginia Investment 7.5
  • National Grid 7.5
  • South Dakota 7.5
  • Glaxo Smith Kline 7.3
  • Rhode Island Employees 7.3
  • Allstate 7.2
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb 7.2
  • Delaware Public Employees 7.1
  • Dominion Resources 7.1
  • ITT 7.0
  • Orange County 7.0
  • Montana Board of Investments 6.9
  • Merrill Lynch 6.9
  • Ohio Deferred Comp 6.8
  • Los Angeles Water & Powere 6.8
  • Walt Disney 6.8
  • Presbytarian Church 6.7
  • Time Warner 6.7
  • First Energy 6.6
  • Cook County Employees 6.6
  • Supervalu 6.6
  • UFCW Industry, IL 6.5
  • Bank of New York Mellon 6.4
  • CBS 6.4
  • American Electric 6.4
  • Oklahoma Public Employees 6.4
  • Target 6.3
  • Duke Energy 6.2
  • Hartford Financial 6.2
  • Unisys 6.2
  • Liberty Mutual 6.2
  • General Mills 6.2
  • FMR 6.2
  • Arizona Public Safety 6.1
  • IMF 6.1
  • Reynolds American 6.0
  • Anheuser-Busch 6.0
  • Sacramento County 6.0
  • Southern California Edison 5.9
  • Wyeth 5.9
  • Los Angeles County Deferred 5.8
  • Morgan Stanley 5.8
  • Wyoming Retirement 5.8
  • Goodyear Tire & Rubber 5.7
  • Source: Pensions & Investments, as of Sept 2008