Tuesday, August 17, 2010

Infovest21 Investor Focus: The Value-Added of a Fund of Funds

The financial crisis of 2008, the Madoff Ponzi scheme and other similar frauds, relatively disappointing returns in 2008 and 2009, liquidity mismatch, the pressure on fees, lack of transparency, the growing knowledge and experience of pensions and consultants with hedge fund, as well as increasing institutional requirements for control and transparency have taken a toll on institutional usage of funds of funds.
Various surveys provide statistics showing pensions taking a more direct investing approach to hedge funds rather than the funds of funds route especially those that have in-house capability to select hedge fund managers.

A recent Preqin survey found that of the institutional investors they surveyed, most have been investing since 2001. When these institutions first made their hedge fund investment, 64% selected fund of funds, 24% used a combination of funds of funds and single managers while only 12% allocated to single managers. Today, the survey found 31% of respondents invest directly with single managers, 34% use a combination of single managers and funds of funds, and 35% are now solely invested in funds of funds.

Another example: Towers Watson said it did nine searches for funds of funds in 2009, down about 80% from 43 searches in 2008.

Asset flows
HFR said funds of funds lost $187 billion in assets from the first of 2008 through mid 2010. In the second quarter of 2010, funds of funds had a $2 billion outflow. Only 31% of funds of funds experienced inflows compared with 59% of all single manager funds in the first quarter of 2010. In this same time frame, hedge funds had inflows of $9.5 billion.

Lois Peltz, president of Infovest21, says, “Another way to look at the situation is to determine the percentage of the industry assets funds of funds represent compared with the total hedge fund industry. In 2010, funds of funds represent about 34% of the industry, down from 59.3% in 2005 and 54.5% in 2006. However, funds of funds had been as low as 18.3% of industry assets in 1999 and as high as 78.8% in 1992.”

Increasingly sophisticated investors are asking funds of funds about the value added they provide i.e. what are they doing to justify their fees. Access to top managers means less than it used to as a number of top managers opened up in the past few years to replenish their assets.
Avoiding manager mistakes, providing strong liquidity management, providing specialist or niche products are some of the ways funds of funds are adding value today. Some are moving more assets toward managed accounts so they can provide more transparency, liquidity and control to the investor. Other large funds of funds are going one step further and providing active management.

Excerpt from Infovest21's June issue of Investor Focus.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Top Pension Funds By Assets ($B)

  • California Public Employees 214.6
  • Federal Retirement Thrift 210.6
  • California State Teachers 147.2
  • New York State Common 138.4
  • Florida State Board 118.7
  • General Motors 110.3
  • New York City Retirement 107.3
  • Texas Teachers 95.9
  • AT&T 89.6
  • New York State Teachers 88.5
  • IBM 78.9
  • Wisconsin Investment Board 74.5
  • New Jersey 71.8
  • North Carolina 70.5
  • General Electric 70.3
  • Ohio Public Employees 69.6
  • Boeing 68.9
  • Ohio State Teachers 62.9
  • Washington State Board 61.5
  • Michigan Retirement 57.2
  • Oregon Public Employees 55.3
  • Pennsylvania School Employees 54.7
  • Verizon 51.8
  • Virginia Retirement 50.4
  • Ford Motor 48.8
  • University of California 47.1
  • Georgia Teachers 46.6
  • Minnesota State Board 46.5
  • Massachusetts PRIM 45.4
  • Lockheed Martin 43.8
  • Alcatel Lucent 41.3
  • Colorado Employees 36.6
  • United Nations Joint Staff 35.4
  • Los Angeles County Employees 35.2
  • Illinois Teachers 34.1
  • Maryland State Retirement 32.7
  • Northrop Grumman 31.9
  • Pennsylvania Employees 31.1
  • Teamsters, Western 30.3
  • Tennessee Consolidated 30.3
  • Bank of America 28.5
  • Exxon Mobil 28.0
  • Alabama Retirement 27.6
  • United Technologies 27.5
  • Chrysler 26.6
  • National Railroad 25.3
  • Missouri Public Schools 24.6
  • Utah State Retirement 24.5
  • South Carolina Retirement 24.5
  • DuPont 24.4
  • United Parcel Service 23.6
  • Arizona State Retirement 23.6
  • Connecticut Retirement 23.6
  • Raytheon 22.8
  • Texas Employees 21.9
  • Citigroup 21.2
  • Teamsters, Central States 21.2
  • Iowa Public Employees 2.6
  • Nevada Public Employees 20.6
  • Illinois Municipal 20.6
  • Hewlett Packard 20.1
  • JPMorgan Chase 19.9
  • Chevron 19.4
  • Honeywell 18.9
  • Mississippi Employees 18.9
  • Dow Chemical 18.7
  • State Farm 17.5
  • Alaska Retirement 17.4
  • Procter & Gamble 17.1
  • FedEx 16.9
  • Kaiser 16.9
  • Shell Oil 16.8
  • American Airlines 16.7
  • 3M 16.2
  • Wells Fargo 16.2
  • San Francisco City & County 15.9
  • United Methodist Church 14.8
  • Prudential 14.6
  • Texas County & District 14.4
  • Texas Municipal Retirement 14.1
  • BP American 14.1
  • Indiana Public Employees 13.9
  • Georgia Employees 13.9
  • World Bank 13.8
  • Illinois State Universities 13.7
  • Los Angeles Fire & Police 13.2
  • Caterpillar 13.2
  • Wachovia 13.2
  • Kentucky Teachers 13.2
  • Louisiana Teachers 13.1
  • Illinois State Board 12.9
  • Delphia 12.9
  • National Electric 12.6
  • Johnson & Johnson 12.6
  • Eastman Kodak 12.5
  • Pfizer 12.5
  • General Dynamics 12.3
  • PG&E 11.9
  • ConocoPhillips 11.9
  • Kentucky Retirement 11.7
  • Exelon 11.6
  • Kansas Public Employees 11.6
  • Deere 11.6
  • Qwest 11.3
  • New Mexico Public Employees 11.0
  • Kraft Foods 10.9
  • International Paper 10.9
  • Alcoa 10.8
  • Siemens USA 10.7
  • Ohio Police & Fire 10.7
  • MetLife 10.7
  • Southern Co 10.5
  • Chicago Teachers 10.3
  • Federal Reserve Employees 10.1
  • Idaho Public Employees 9.9
  • Hawaii Employees 9.8
  • New York State Deferred Comp 9.8
  • Los Angeles City Employees 9.7
  • Ohio School Employees 9.6
  • Arkansas Teachers 9.6
  • Maine State Retirement 9.6
  • Wal-Mart Stores 9.5
  • Weyerhaeuser 9.5
  • Consolidated Edison 9.5
  • Koch Industries 9.5
  • US Steel 9.4
  • Abbott Laboratories 8.9
  • Episcopal Church 8.9
  • 1199SEIU National 8.9
  • Motorola 8.8
  • Operating Eng. International 8.8
  • Xerox 8.8
  • Altria 8.7
  • PepsiCo 8.4
  • Delta Air Lines 8.4
  • Missouri State Employees 8.3
  • Eli Lilly 8.3
  • Oklahoma Teachers 8.2
  • National Rural Electric 8.1
  • Boilermaker-Blacksmith 8.1
  • Northwest Airlines 8.0
  • Sears Holding 8.0
  • Aetna 7.9
  • New Mexico Educational 7.9
  • New York City Deferred Comp 7.9
  • Electrical Ind, Joint Board 7.9
  • Intel 7.9
  • Nebraska Investment Council 7.8
  • Indiana Teachers 7.8
  • JC Penney 7.8
  • Louisiana State Employees 7.8
  • Merck 7.8
  • IAM National 7.7
  • Tennessee Valley Authority 7.5
  • San Diego County 7.5
  • West Virginia Investment 7.5
  • National Grid 7.5
  • South Dakota 7.5
  • Glaxo Smith Kline 7.3
  • Rhode Island Employees 7.3
  • Allstate 7.2
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb 7.2
  • Delaware Public Employees 7.1
  • Dominion Resources 7.1
  • ITT 7.0
  • Orange County 7.0
  • Montana Board of Investments 6.9
  • Merrill Lynch 6.9
  • Ohio Deferred Comp 6.8
  • Los Angeles Water & Powere 6.8
  • Walt Disney 6.8
  • Presbytarian Church 6.7
  • Time Warner 6.7
  • First Energy 6.6
  • Cook County Employees 6.6
  • Supervalu 6.6
  • UFCW Industry, IL 6.5
  • Bank of New York Mellon 6.4
  • CBS 6.4
  • American Electric 6.4
  • Oklahoma Public Employees 6.4
  • Target 6.3
  • Duke Energy 6.2
  • Hartford Financial 6.2
  • Unisys 6.2
  • Liberty Mutual 6.2
  • General Mills 6.2
  • FMR 6.2
  • Arizona Public Safety 6.1
  • IMF 6.1
  • Reynolds American 6.0
  • Anheuser-Busch 6.0
  • Sacramento County 6.0
  • Southern California Edison 5.9
  • Wyeth 5.9
  • Los Angeles County Deferred 5.8
  • Morgan Stanley 5.8
  • Wyoming Retirement 5.8
  • Goodyear Tire & Rubber 5.7
  • Source: Pensions & Investments, as of Sept 2008