Outsourced investment offices say it makes economic sense for an endowment to build its own investment office when assets exceed $1.0 billion.
Cambridge Associates says institutional investors with assets between $100 million and $1 billon are most likely to use outsourced solutions.
“As the assets under management get smaller and smaller, they reach a point where the organization cannot, or chooses not to, afford an in-house office. They need it, but they just have a problem with the cost,” says Michael Bunn of The Endowment Office. “If you can afford to use an investment office, whether it is shared or by yourself, that makes sense. You get a better quality of service and a more customized portfolio. You now see the boards that do it themselves looking for alternatives to the consultants.”
For smaller institutional investors, Bunn highlights two options: outsourcing the CIO approach or using the shared office approach.
The number of US institutional investors outsourcing their chief investment officer functions has doubled in recent years and is expected to grow quickly due continuing internal institutional staff and budget cuts, the desire for institutions to simplify internal operations, a possible need for a quick temporary solution, fiduciary fatigue caused by limited time and resources conflicting with new valuation methodologies and increasing allocation to more complex alternative investments.
A Casey Quirk study predicted that the investment outsourcing market will grow to $510 billion by 2012, representing about 13% of institutional assets and 25% of institutional investors.
With investment outsourcing, the consulting or investment firm assumes responsibility for asset allocation and implementation, acting in the same capacity as a professional investment staff of the largest institutions.
Cambridge Associates says each outsourced CIO relationship they’re involved with is tailored to meet the specific needs of each institution. Some clients have a CIO in place and look to them to act as the outsourced investment staff and support to the work of the CIO and investment committee. Other clients have no CIO or staff in place and hire the outsourced provider to act as the outsourced investment office. While some clients seek to retain authority over manager hiring and firing, others look to the outside provider to provide very directive recommendations.
NewProvidence’s Andrew Vogelstein says, “It is important to understand each institution’s particular and unique set of circumstances including everything from … its finances to limitations set forth in its investment policy statement…We expect and want constructive feedback. Depending on the client, this back-and-forth process can happen quickly, or take time. In the end, the client will have a portfolio designed to suit its unique circumstances.”
Shared office
The shared office is The Endowment Office’s primary business. “The shared office is like any other investment office for any large university endowment. Each investment strategy is different because the investment committees want it customized. The shared office customizes investment strategy across all asset classes, and is a separate account or managed account with its unique custodian, separate relationships with managers. Not all the managers or asset classes are the same for each organization, it depends on the organization,” says Bunn.
Bunn says the shared office is a little more expensive than an outsourced CIO approach but the cost is spread out among multiple organizations at a reduced rate. There are a limited number of endowments that can share an office.
Infovest21\'s Just Released Issue of Investor Focus – Outsourced Investment Offices
Interviews with Cambridge Associates, Partners Capital, New Providence and The Endowment Office Issue also includes:
Side bar: Casey Quirk Outsourcing Survey
Who’s Who: Outsourced Investment Offices
Quarterly sentiment indicator: Marketers
Order your copy by calling Infovest21 212-686-6440. $150 per issue. $1000 for annual subscription
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Top Pension Funds By Assets ($B)
- California Public Employees 214.6
- Federal Retirement Thrift 210.6
- California State Teachers 147.2
- New York State Common 138.4
- Florida State Board 118.7
- General Motors 110.3
- New York City Retirement 107.3
- Texas Teachers 95.9
- AT&T 89.6
- New York State Teachers 88.5
- IBM 78.9
- Wisconsin Investment Board 74.5
- New Jersey 71.8
- North Carolina 70.5
- General Electric 70.3
- Ohio Public Employees 69.6
- Boeing 68.9
- Ohio State Teachers 62.9
- Washington State Board 61.5
- Michigan Retirement 57.2
- Oregon Public Employees 55.3
- Pennsylvania School Employees 54.7
- Verizon 51.8
- Virginia Retirement 50.4
- Ford Motor 48.8
- University of California 47.1
- Georgia Teachers 46.6
- Minnesota State Board 46.5
- Massachusetts PRIM 45.4
- Lockheed Martin 43.8
- Alcatel Lucent 41.3
- Colorado Employees 36.6
- United Nations Joint Staff 35.4
- Los Angeles County Employees 35.2
- Illinois Teachers 34.1
- Maryland State Retirement 32.7
- Northrop Grumman 31.9
- Pennsylvania Employees 31.1
- Teamsters, Western 30.3
- Tennessee Consolidated 30.3
- Bank of America 28.5
- Exxon Mobil 28.0
- Alabama Retirement 27.6
- United Technologies 27.5
- Chrysler 26.6
- National Railroad 25.3
- Missouri Public Schools 24.6
- Utah State Retirement 24.5
- South Carolina Retirement 24.5
- DuPont 24.4
- United Parcel Service 23.6
- Arizona State Retirement 23.6
- Connecticut Retirement 23.6
- Raytheon 22.8
- Texas Employees 21.9
- Citigroup 21.2
- Teamsters, Central States 21.2
- Iowa Public Employees 2.6
- Nevada Public Employees 20.6
- Illinois Municipal 20.6
- Hewlett Packard 20.1
- JPMorgan Chase 19.9
- Chevron 19.4
- Honeywell 18.9
- Mississippi Employees 18.9
- Dow Chemical 18.7
- State Farm 17.5
- Alaska Retirement 17.4
- Procter & Gamble 17.1
- FedEx 16.9
- Kaiser 16.9
- Shell Oil 16.8
- American Airlines 16.7
- 3M 16.2
- Wells Fargo 16.2
- San Francisco City & County 15.9
- United Methodist Church 14.8
- Prudential 14.6
- Texas County & District 14.4
- Texas Municipal Retirement 14.1
- BP American 14.1
- Indiana Public Employees 13.9
- Georgia Employees 13.9
- World Bank 13.8
- Illinois State Universities 13.7
- Los Angeles Fire & Police 13.2
- Caterpillar 13.2
- Wachovia 13.2
- Kentucky Teachers 13.2
- Louisiana Teachers 13.1
- Illinois State Board 12.9
- Delphia 12.9
- National Electric 12.6
- Johnson & Johnson 12.6
- Eastman Kodak 12.5
- Pfizer 12.5
- General Dynamics 12.3
- PG&E 11.9
- ConocoPhillips 11.9
- Kentucky Retirement 11.7
- Exelon 11.6
- Kansas Public Employees 11.6
- Deere 11.6
- Qwest 11.3
- New Mexico Public Employees 11.0
- Kraft Foods 10.9
- International Paper 10.9
- Alcoa 10.8
- Siemens USA 10.7
- Ohio Police & Fire 10.7
- MetLife 10.7
- Southern Co 10.5
- Chicago Teachers 10.3
- Federal Reserve Employees 10.1
- Idaho Public Employees 9.9
- Hawaii Employees 9.8
- New York State Deferred Comp 9.8
- Los Angeles City Employees 9.7
- Ohio School Employees 9.6
- Arkansas Teachers 9.6
- Maine State Retirement 9.6
- Wal-Mart Stores 9.5
- Weyerhaeuser 9.5
- Consolidated Edison 9.5
- Koch Industries 9.5
- US Steel 9.4
- Abbott Laboratories 8.9
- Episcopal Church 8.9
- 1199SEIU National 8.9
- Motorola 8.8
- Operating Eng. International 8.8
- Xerox 8.8
- Altria 8.7
- PepsiCo 8.4
- Delta Air Lines 8.4
- Missouri State Employees 8.3
- Eli Lilly 8.3
- Oklahoma Teachers 8.2
- National Rural Electric 8.1
- Boilermaker-Blacksmith 8.1
- Northwest Airlines 8.0
- Sears Holding 8.0
- Aetna 7.9
- New Mexico Educational 7.9
- New York City Deferred Comp 7.9
- Electrical Ind, Joint Board 7.9
- Intel 7.9
- Nebraska Investment Council 7.8
- Indiana Teachers 7.8
- JC Penney 7.8
- Louisiana State Employees 7.8
- Merck 7.8
- IAM National 7.7
- Tennessee Valley Authority 7.5
- San Diego County 7.5
- West Virginia Investment 7.5
- National Grid 7.5
- South Dakota 7.5
- Glaxo Smith Kline 7.3
- Rhode Island Employees 7.3
- Allstate 7.2
- Bristol-Myers Squibb 7.2
- Delaware Public Employees 7.1
- Dominion Resources 7.1
- ITT 7.0
- Orange County 7.0
- Montana Board of Investments 6.9
- Merrill Lynch 6.9
- Ohio Deferred Comp 6.8
- Los Angeles Water & Powere 6.8
- Walt Disney 6.8
- Presbytarian Church 6.7
- Time Warner 6.7
- First Energy 6.6
- Cook County Employees 6.6
- Supervalu 6.6
- UFCW Industry, IL 6.5
- Bank of New York Mellon 6.4
- CBS 6.4
- American Electric 6.4
- Oklahoma Public Employees 6.4
- Target 6.3
- Duke Energy 6.2
- Hartford Financial 6.2
- Unisys 6.2
- Liberty Mutual 6.2
- General Mills 6.2
- FMR 6.2
- Arizona Public Safety 6.1
- IMF 6.1
- Reynolds American 6.0
- Anheuser-Busch 6.0
- Sacramento County 6.0
- Southern California Edison 5.9
- Wyeth 5.9
- Los Angeles County Deferred 5.8
- Morgan Stanley 5.8
- Wyoming Retirement 5.8
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber 5.7
- Source: Pensions & Investments, as of Sept 2008
No comments:
Post a Comment